Public.Law logo Colorado.Public.Law
  • Colorado Revised Statutes
  • Remove ads
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Search: 13-21-111

Search: 13-21-111
1 – 8 of 9

C.R.S. 13-21-111
Courts and Court Procedure
Negligence cases
  • comparative negligence as measure of damages
C.R.S. 33-44-112
Parks and Wildlife
Limitation on actions for injury resulting from inherent dangers and risks of skiing
C.R.S. 13-21-111.7
Courts and Court Procedure
Assumption of risk
  • consideration by trier of fact
C.R.S. 13-50.5-105
Courts and Court Procedure
Release or covenant not to sue
C.R.S. 13-21-406
Courts and Court Procedure
Comparative fault as measure of damages
C.R.S. 13-20-1205
Courts and Court Procedure
No contributory negligence
  • interest on damages
  • limitation on damages
C.R.S. 13-21-120
Courts and Court Procedure
Colorado baseball spectator safety act
  • legislative declaration
  • limitation on actions
  • duty to post warning notice
C.R.S. 13-21-115
Courts and Court Procedure
Actions against landowners
  • short title
  • legislative declaration
  • definitions
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next ›
  • Last »
 


Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Get Legal Help

The Colorado Bar Association runs a service for finding an attorney in good standing. Initial consultations are usually free or discounted: Find a Licensed Lawyer

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • Find a Lawyer
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • API
  • Contact Us
  • Reports
  • Secondary Sources
  • Privacy Policy
California: Codes
Colorado: C.R.S.
Florida: Statutes
Nevada: NRS
New York: Laws
Oregon: OAR, ORS
Texas: Statutes
World: Rome Statute, International Dictionary

Location:

Blank Outline Levels

The legislature occasionally skips outline levels. For example: 

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

In this example, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was omitted by its authors. It's only implied. This presents an interesting challenge when laying out the text. We've decided to display a blank section with this note, in order to aide readability.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line.