C.R.S.
Section 25.5-5-421
Parity reporting
- state department
- public input
(1)
The state department shall require each MCE contracted with the state department to disclose all necessary information in order for the state department, by June 1, 2020, and by each June 1 thereafter, to submit a report to the health and insurance committee and the public health care and human services committee of the house of representatives, or their successor committees, and to the health and human services committee of the senate, or its successor committee, regarding behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorder parity. The report must contain the following information for the prior calendar year:(a)
A description of the process used to develop or select the medical necessity criteria for behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorder benefits and the process used to develop or select the medical necessity criteria for medical and surgical benefits;(b)
Identification of all nonquantitative treatment limitations that are applied to behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorder benefits and to medical and surgical benefits within each classification of benefits and a statement that the state is complying with 42 U.S.C. sec. 300gg-26 (a)(3)(A)(ii), as required by 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396u-2 (b)(8), prohibiting the application of nonquantitative treatment limitations to behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorder benefits that do not apply to medical and surgical benefits within any classification of benefits;(c)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
The results of analyses demonstrating that, for the medical necessity criteria described in subsection (1)(a) of this section and each nonquantitative treatment limitation identified in subsection (1)(b) of this section, as written and in operation, the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors used in applying the medical necessity criteria and each nonquantitative treatment limitation to benefits for behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorders within each classification of benefits are comparable to, and are applied no more stringently than, the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors used in applying the medical necessity criteria and each nonquantitative treatment limitation to medical and surgical benefits within the corresponding classification of benefits.(II)
A report on the results of the analyses specified in this subsection (1)(c) must, at a minimum:(A)
Identify the factors used to determine that a nonquantitative treatment limitation will apply to a benefit, including factors that were considered but rejected;(B)
Identify and define the specific evidentiary standards used to define the factors and any other evidence relied on in designing each nonquantitative treatment limitation;(C)
Provide the comparative analyses, including the results of the analyses, performed to determine that the processes and strategies used to design each nonquantitative treatment limitation, as written, and the written processes and strategies used to apply each nonquantitative treatment limitation for benefits for behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorders are comparable to, and are applied no more stringently than, the processes and strategies used to design and apply each nonquantitative treatment limitation, as written, and the written processes and strategies used to apply each nonquantitative treatment limitation for medical and surgical benefits;(D)
Provide the comparative analyses, including the results of the analyses, performed to determine that the processes and strategies used to apply each nonquantitative treatment limitation, in operation, for benefits for behavioral, mental health, and substance use disorders are comparable to, and are applied no more stringently than, the processes and strategies used to apply each nonquantitative treatment limitation, in operation, for medical and surgical benefits; and(E)
Disclose the specific findings and conclusions that indicate that the state is in compliance with this section and with the MHPAEA.(2)
By October 1, 2019, for purposes of obtaining meaningful public input during the assessment process described in subsection (1) of this section, the state department shall seek input from stakeholders who may have competency in benefit and delivery systems, utilization management, managed care contracting, data and reporting, or compliance and audits. The state department shall consider the input received in conducting the analyses and developing the report pursuant to subsection (1) of this section.(3)
Notwithstanding section 24-1-136 (11)(a)(I), the reporting requirement specified in this section continues indefinitely.(4)
The state department shall contract with an external quality review organization at least annually to monitor MCEs’ utilization management programs and policies, including those that govern adverse determinations, to ensure compliance with the MHPAEA. The quality review report must be readily available to the public.
Source:
Section 25.5-5-421 — Parity reporting - state department - public input, https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2023-title-25.5.pdf (accessed Oct. 20, 2023).
Up to date