C.R.S. Section 8-2-113
Unlawful to intimidate worker

  • agreement not to compete
  • prohibition
  • exceptions
  • notice
  • definitions

Mentioned in

How To Know if a Non-Compete Agreement Is Reasonable

LawDepot, October 17, 2023

“A Non-Compete Agreement restricts an employee from entering into competition with an employer after their employment period ends. Some Non-Compete Agreements can be unreasonable and limit your future job prospects.”
 
Bibliographic info

Colorado Increases Range of Criminal Penalties for Violating Non-Compete Statute

JD Supra, January 17, 2022

“Although other states outlaw nefarious labor practices, like boycotting and blacklisting, few (if any) prohibit as expansive a range of practices as § 8-2-113(1).”
 
Bibliographic info

(1)

Legislative intent.
The general assembly intends to preserve existing state and federal case law in effect before August 10, 2022, that:

(a)

Defines what counts as a covenant not to compete that is prohibited by this section; and

(b)

Specifies the extent to which a covenant not to compete for the protection of trade secrets must be tailored in scope in order to be enforceable under this section.

(1.5)

Intentionally left blank —Ed.

(a)

It is unlawful to use force, threats, or other means of intimidation to prevent any person from engaging in any lawful occupation at any place the person sees fit.

(b)

A person who violates this subsection (1.5) commits a class 2 misdemeanor, as defined in section 18-1.3-501.

(2)

Intentionally left blank —Ed.

(a)

Except as provided in subsections (2)(b) and (3) of this section, any covenant not to compete that restricts the right of any person to receive compensation for performance of labor for any employer is void.

(b)

This subsection (2) does not apply to a covenant not to compete governing a person who, at the time the covenant not to compete is entered into and at the time it is enforced, earns an amount of annualized cash compensation equivalent to or greater than the threshold amount for highly compensated workers, if the covenant not to compete is for the protection of trade secrets and is no broader than is reasonably necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate interest in protecting trade secrets.

(c)

As used in this subsection (2):

(I)

“Annualized cash compensation” means:

(A)

The amount of the gross salary or wage amount, the fee amount, or the other compensation amount for the full year, if the person was employed or engaged for a full year;

(B)

The compensation that the person would have earned, based on the worker’s gross salary or wage amount, fee, or other compensation if the worker was not employed or engaged for a full year.

(II)

“Threshold amount for highly compensated workers” means the greater of the threshold amount for highly compensated workers as determined by the division of labor standards and statistics in the department of labor and employment:

(A)

As of August 10, 2022; or

(B)

At the time the covenant not to compete is executed by the parties.

(III)

In determining whether a worker’s cash compensation exceeds the threshold amount, where the worker has been employed for less than a calendar year, the worker’s cash compensation exceeds the threshold amount if the worker would reasonably expect to earn more than the threshold amount during a calendar year of employment.

(d)

This subsection (2) does not apply to a covenant not to solicit customers governing a person who, at the time the covenant is entered into and at the time it is enforced, earns an amount of annualized cash compensation equivalent to or greater than sixty percent of the threshold amount for highly compensated workers if the nonsolicitation covenant is no broader than reasonably necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate interest in protecting trade secrets.

(3)

The following covenants are not prohibited by subsection (2) of this section:

(a)

A provision providing for an employer’s recovery of the expense of educating and training a worker where the training is distinct from normal, on-the-job training, the employer’s recovery is limited to the reasonable costs of the training and decreases over the course of the two years subsequent to the training proportionately based on the number of months that have passed since the completion of the training, and the employer recovering for the costs of the training would not violate the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938”, 29 U.S.C. sec. 201 et seq., or article 4 of this title 8;

(b)

A reasonable confidentiality provision relevant to the employer’s business that does not prohibit disclosure of information that arises from the worker’s general training, knowledge, skill, or experience, whether gained on the job or otherwise, information that is readily ascertainable to the public, or information that a worker otherwise has a right to disclose as legally protected conduct;

(c)

A covenant for the purchase and sale of a business or the assets of a business; or

(d)

A provision requiring the repayment of a scholarship provided to an individual working in an apprenticeship if the individual fails to comply with the conditions of the scholarship agreement.

(4)

Intentionally left blank —Ed.

(a)

Any covenant not to compete that is otherwise permissible under subsection (2) or (3) of this section is void unless notice of the covenant not to compete and the terms of the covenant not to compete are provided to:

(I)

A prospective worker before the worker accepts the employer’s offer of employment; or

(II)

A current worker at least fourteen days before the earlier of:

(A)

The effective date of the covenant; or

(B)

The effective date of any additional compensation or change in the terms or conditions of employment that provides consideration for the covenant.

(b)

An employer shall provide the notice required in subsection (4)(a) of this section in a separate document from any other covenants between the worker and employer and in clear and conspicuous terms in the language in which the worker and employer communicate about the worker’s performance. The notice must be signed by the worker.

(c)

Intentionally left blank —Ed.

(I)

A worker may request an additional copy of the covenant not to compete required by this subsection (4) once each calendar year.

(II)

An employer is not required under this subsection (4) to provide the worker with an additional copy of the covenant not to compete more than once during a calendar year.

(d)

An employer satisfies the notice requirement of this subsection (4) when the notice:

(I)

Is provided with a copy of the agreement containing the covenant not to compete;

(II)

Identifies the agreement by name and states that the agreement contains a covenant not to compete that could restrict the workers’ options for subsequent employment following their separation from the employer; and

(III)

Directs the worker to the specific sections or paragraphs of the agreement that contain the covenant not to compete.

(5)

Intentionally left blank —Ed.

(a)

Any covenant not to compete provision of an employment, partnership, or corporate agreement between physicians that restricts the right of a physician to practice medicine, as defined in section 12-240-107, upon termination of the agreement, is void; except that all other provisions of the agreement enforceable at law, including provisions that require the payment of damages in an amount that is reasonably related to the injury suffered by reason of termination of the agreement, are enforceable. Provisions of a covenant not to compete that require the payment of damages upon termination of the agreement may include damages related to competition.

(b)

Notwithstanding subsection (5)(a) of this section, after termination of an agreement described in subsection (5)(a) of this section, a physician may disclose his or her continuing practice of medicine and new professional contact information to any patient with a rare disorder, as defined in accordance with criteria developed by the National Organization for Rare Disorders, Inc., or a successor organization, to whom the physician was providing consultation or treatment before termination of the agreement. Neither the physician nor the physician’s employer, if any, is liable to any party to the prior agreement for damages alleged to have resulted from the disclosure or from the physician’s treatment of the patient after termination of the prior agreement.

(6)

A covenant not to compete that applies to a worker who, at the time of termination of employment, primarily resided or worked in Colorado may not require the worker to adjudicate the enforceability of the covenant outside of Colorado. Notwithstanding any contractual provision to the contrary, Colorado law governs the enforceability of a covenant not to compete for a worker who, at the time of termination of employment, primarily resided and worked in Colorado.

(7)

A worker who is a party to a covenant not to compete, or a subsequent employer that has hired or is considering hiring the worker, may seek a declaratory judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction or an arbitrator that the covenant not to compete is unenforceable.

(8)

Intentionally left blank —Ed.

(a)

An employer shall not enter into, present to a worker or prospective worker as a term of employment, or attempt to enforce any covenant not to compete that is void under this section.

(b)

An employer that violates subsection (8)(a) of this section is liable for actual damages and a penalty of five thousand dollars per worker or prospective worker harmed by the conduct. The attorney general and any worker or prospective worker harmed by an employer’s conduct may bring an action for injunctive relief and to recover penalties. In addition to injunctive relief and the penalty allowed in this subsection (8)(b), a worker or prospective worker may recover actual damages, reasonable costs, and attorney fees in any private action brought under this section.

(c)

In any action brought under this subsection (8), if the employer shows that the act or omission giving rise to such action was in good faith and that the employer had reasonable grounds for believing that the employer’s act or omission was not a violation of this section, the court may, in its sound discretion, award the worker or workers no penalty or award a penalty of any amount not to exceed the amount specified in subsection (8)(b) of this section.

Source: Section 8-2-113 — Unlawful to intimidate worker - agreement not to compete - prohibition - exceptions - notice - definitions, https://leg.­colorado.­gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2023-title-08.­pdf (accessed Oct. 20, 2023).

8‑2‑101
Combination of employees for peaceable objects lawful
8‑2‑102
Coercion of employees unlawful
8‑2‑103
Penalty for coercing employees
8‑2‑104
Obtaining workmen by misrepresentation unlawful
8‑2‑105
Penalty
8‑2‑106
Armed guards - when lawful
8‑2‑107
Workman engaged by false representations to recover damages
8‑2‑108
Unlawful for employer to prevent employees participating in politics
8‑2‑109
Rights of person charged with contempt
8‑2‑110
Unlawful to publish blacklist
8‑2‑111
Penalty for blacklisting
8‑2‑111.5
Certain employment references - exception to blacklisting prohibition
8‑2‑111.6
Health-care employers - immunity from civil liability - requirements - exception to blacklisting prohibition - legislative declaration
8‑2‑111.7
Employees working with persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities - immunity from civil liability - requirements - exception to blacklisting prohibition - legislative declaration - definitions
8‑2‑112
Unlawful to publish notice of boycott
8‑2‑113
Unlawful to intimidate worker - agreement not to compete - prohibition - exceptions - notice - definitions
8‑2‑114
Immunity from civil liability for employer disclosing information - employer shall not maintain blacklist - credit lists excepted
8‑2‑118
Cost of medical examination - employer and employee defined
8‑2‑119
Awards of back pay - deduction of unemployment compensation
8‑2‑120
Residency requirements prohibited for public employment - legislative declaration - definitions
8‑2‑122
Employment verification requirements - audits - fine for fraudulent documents - cash fund created - definitions
8‑2‑123
Health-care workers - retaliation prohibited - definitions
8‑2‑124
Electronic verification program - availability - notice to employers - definitions
8‑2‑125
Identification of workers engaged in off-site work - permissible forms of identification - exceptions - definitions
8‑2‑126
Employer use of consumer credit information - violation - short title - definitions
8‑2‑127
Prohibitions of employer - requiring access to personal electronic communication devices - definitions - rules
8‑2‑128
Prohibitions of employer - requiring social security number - exceptions
8‑2‑129
Access to personnel files and records - definitions - exemptions
8‑2‑130
Criminal history - limits on advertisements and applications - exceptions - enforcement - rules - short title - definitions
8‑2‑131
Age of job applicants - limits on applications - exceptions - enforcement - rules - short title - definitions
8‑2‑201
Damages - fellow servant rule abolished - limitation on admission of criminal history
8‑2‑202
Damages in case of death - limit
8‑2‑203
Who may sue - consolidation of actions
8‑2‑204
Limitation of actions - limit of damages
8‑2‑205
Assumption of risk abolished
8‑2‑206
Agricultural employers - agricultural employees - violations - penalties - definitions
Green check means up to date. Up to date

Current through Fall 2024

§ 8-2-113’s source at colorado​.gov