C.R.S.
Section 24-37.5-119
Broadband service
- report
- broadband deployment board
- broadband administrative fund
- creation
- rules
- legislative declaration
- definitions
- repeal
(1)
Short title.(2)
The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that to promote the state policy of providing universal access to broadband service, as set forth in section 40-15-502 (4), it may be necessary to provide financial assistance through additional support mechanisms if competition for local exchange services fails to deliver broadband service throughout the state. “Advanced service” includes “broadband service” for purposes of this section only.(3)
The commission may allocate the high cost support mechanism for the deployment of broadband service in unserved areas of the state pursuant to this section and section 40-15-208 only. The commission may fund the deployment of broadband service in unserved areas of the state through use of the HCSM surcharge and surcharge rate in effect on January 1, 2018. Pursuant to subsection (4) of this section and consistent with sections 40-15-207 and 40-15-208, the commission shall determine funds available for broadband deployment and the administration of the board as prescribed in section 40-15-208 or from the HCSM money that it determines is no longer required by the HCSM to support universal basic service, as that term is defined in section 40-15-102 (3), through an effective competition determination. An HCSM third-party contractor shall maintain and hold the money available for broadband deployment in a separate account from money used for basic voice service. Money held for broadband deployment shall not be disbursed for basic voice service, and money held for basic voice service shall not be disbursed for broadband deployment. The commission shall only disburse money for broadband deployment grants from the HCSM as directed by the board. Nothing in this section increases any surcharge rate charged to help fund the HCSM.(4)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
There is hereby created in the state treasury the broadband administrative fund, referred to in this section as the “fund”. The fund consists of all money allocated from the HCSM for the administration of the board and all money that the general assembly may appropriate to the fund. The money in the fund is subject to annual appropriation by the general assembly for the purposes set forth in this section. All interest earned from the investment of money in the fund is credited to the fund. All money not expended at the end of any state fiscal year remains in the fund and does not revert to the general fund or any other fund.(b)
Repealed.(5)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
There is hereby created in the office the broadband deployment board, referred to in this section as the “board”. The board is an independent board created to implement and administer the deployment of broadband service in unserved areas. The office shall staff the board. The board has the powers and duties specified in this section.(b)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
Repealed.(II)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(A)
Commencing on September 1, 2021, the board consists of eleven voting members. The members of the board shall be selected on the basis of their knowledge of and interest in broadband service and shall serve for four-year terms. A member of the board shall not serve more than two consecutive full four-year terms; except that the limit on terms of office does not apply to the board member representing the office.(B)
An appointing authority may appoint a board member seated on the board on August 31, 2021, to continue serving on the board on and after September 1, 2021, for the remainder of the board member’s existing term as of August 31, 2021, if the board member meets the board membership criteria set forth in subsection (7)(d) of this section and the board member’s continued membership on the board does not enlarge the membership of the board authorized under subsection (5)(b)(II)(A) of this section. If otherwise eligible for reappointment, the board member may be appointed for an additional term after September 1, 2021. This subsection (5)(b)(II)(B) is repealed, effective September 1, 2024.(6)
Repealed.(7)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
The board shall meet as often as necessary to carry out its duties as defined in this section.(b)
The term of any member of the board who misses more than two consecutive regular board meetings without good cause shall be terminated, and the member’s successor shall be appointed in the manner provided for appointments under this section.(c)
Repealed.(d)
Commencing on September 1, 2021, at least three members of the board must be affiliated with one of the two major political parties and at least three members must be affiliated with the other major political party, with each member having been registered with their political party for at least one year. At least three members of the board must be unaffiliated with either of the major political parties, having been unaffiliated for at least one year. Members of the board are entitled to seventy-five dollars per diem for attendance at official meetings plus actual and necessary expenses incurred in the conduct of official business. Members of the board shall be appointed as follows:(I)
One voting member from the office, appointed by the governor;(II)
Three voting members representing local entities:(A)
One of whom is a county commissioner from the eastern plains of the state, appointed by the president of the senate;(B)
One of whom is a county commissioner from the western slope of the state, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives; and(C)
One of whom represents a rural city or town as a mayor or city councilperson, as appointed by the governor. As used in this subsection (7)(d)(II)(C), “rural” has the meaning set forth in section 24-32-3603 (3)(a).(III)
Five voting members representing the broadband industry:(A)
One of whom represents a wireless provider, appointed by the president of the senate;(B)
One of whom represents a wireline provider, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives;(C)
One of whom represents a broadband satellite provider, appointed by the minority leader of the house of representatives;(D)
One of whom represents a cable provider, appointed by the minority leader of the senate; and(E)
One of whom represents a rural wireline provider, appointed by the minority leader of the senate; and(IV)
Two voting members of the public:(A)
One of whom resides in an unserved area of the western slope of the state, appointed by the governor; and(B)
One of whom resides in an unserved area of the eastern plains of the state, appointed by the minority leader of the house of representatives.(e)
Commencing on September 1, 2021:(I)
If a board member has a conflict of interest with respect to any matter addressed by the board, including a financial interest in the matter, the member shall recuse himself or herself from any discussion or decisions on the matter;(II)
A board member appointed pursuant to subsection (7)(d)(I), (7)(d)(II), or (7)(d)(IV) of this section is not deemed to have a conflict of interest merely by virtue of residing in or representing an unserved area, a critically unserved area, or an area that is the subject of an application before the board; and(III)
A board member appointed pursuant to subsection (7)(d)(III) of this section is deemed to have a conflict of interest with respect to an application filed by an entity that the board member represents; however, if such application is filed, the board member may still participate in discussions about other applications before the board but shall not vote on those other applications.(f)
In the event of a tie vote of the board, the application, appeal, proposition, or other matter being voted upon fails.(g)
Commencing on September 1, 2021, six members of the board constitute a quorum.(8)
The board shall provide notice to and requests for proposals from incumbent providers, incumbent broadband providers, and local entities about the board’s purpose to deploy broadband service in unserved areas. The board shall ensure that both the manner and amount of notice provided under this subsection (8) are adequate and equitable for all potentially eligible applicants.(9)
The board shall direct the commission to transfer money, in a manner consistent with this section, from the HCSM account dedicated for broadband deployment pursuant to subsection (3) of this section to approved grant applicants. The board shall develop criteria for awarding money for new projects to deploy broadband in unserved areas, including:(a)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
Developing a project application process that places the burden on an eligible applicant to demonstrate that its proposed project meets the project eligibility criteria established in this subsection (9), including a requirement that the proposal concern a new project, and not a project already in progress, and a requirement to prove that the area to be served by the proposed project is an unserved area.(II)
To prove that the area to be served is an unserved area, the applicant:(A)
Must submit a map and a list of household addresses demonstrating the insufficient availability of broadband service in the area to the board; the board of county commissioners, city council, or other local entity with authority over the area to be served; and all incumbent providers or incumbent broadband providers that provide broadband internet service or broadband service in the area proposed to be served in the application; and(B)
May submit to the board either the written certification of a local entity as described in subsection (9)(a)(III) of this section or a statistically representative number of speed tests performed in accordance with subsection (9)(a)(VII) of this section.(III)
As additional evidence of the insufficient availability of broadband service in the area that an applicant proposes to serve, the applicant may request from a local entity with jurisdiction over the area proposed to be served a written certification that the area is an unserved area. The local entity shall not provide written certification until after the local entity has:(A)
Provided public notice, including notification to any incumbent provider, if any, and held a hearing on the issue; and(B)
Collected, solicited, and reviewed any quantitative data that it deems appropriate regarding the availability of broadband service in the area that the applicant proposes to serve. A local entity must collect, solicit, and review quantitative data in accordance with rules adopted by the chief information officer, in consultation with the board, regarding standards concerning quantitative data.(IV)
The board shall establish a notice and comment period of forty-five days within which any interested party, including a local entity with jurisdiction over the area proposed to be served, may review and comment on the application.(V)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(A)
The board shall develop a request for proposal process under which, for each calendar year, the board reserves up to sixty percent of the HCSM money allocated for broadband deployment to award grants to proposed projects that serve critically unserved areas identified by the office, including any critically unserved areas within the boundaries of an Indian reservation located within the state.(B)
At the end of each calendar year, any of the reserved money not awarded through the request for proposal process remains available for distribution through the existing grant application process.(C)
All application and appeal processes and criteria set forth in this subsection (9) apply to the request for proposal process; except that the requirement to prove that an area to be served by a proposed project is an unserved area as set forth in subsection (9)(a)(I) of this section does not apply and subsections (9)(a)(II), (9)(a)(III), (9)(b), and (9)(d) of this section do not apply. Subsection (9)(e)(II) of this section only applies to the request for proposal process in the limited manner indicated in that subsection.(D)
The board, in implementing the request for proposal process, need not comply with the “Procurement Code”, articles 101 to 112 of this title 24.(E)
This subsection (9)(a)(V) is repealed, effective September 1, 2024.(VI)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(A)
On or before November 1, 2021, the office shall develop and submit to the board one or more maps identifying the critically unserved areas in the state. The board shall utilize the maps submitted when reviewing any application or appeal pursuant to this section.(B)
With regard to the request for proposal process set forth in subsection (9)(a)(V) of this section, based on the maps submitted, the board shall choose critically unserved areas for which the board shall solicit proposed project bids to serve those areas. In choosing the critically unserved areas for which the board will solicit proposed project bids, the board shall strive to ensure geographic diversity among the areas chosen. This subsection (9)(a)(VI)(B) is repealed, effective September 1, 2024.(VII)
If an applicant filing an application or an appellant filing an appeal pursuant to subsection (9)(k)(III) of this section submits, as part of the application or appeal, a speed test performed on an incumbent provider’s network, the speed test shall be performed in accordance with industry-standard speed-test protocols as identified by the FCC.(b)
Developing a methodology for determining whether a proposed project will serve unserved areas. The board’s methodology must give substantial weight to a local entity’s written certification on the issue of whether the area to be served is an unserved area.(c)
Denying funding for applications that overbuild areas receiving federal sources of high cost support or federal broadband grants for construction of a broadband network that will be completed within twenty-four months after the date that the applicant filed the application so as to maximize the total available state and federal support for rural broadband development. An incumbent broadband provider receiving federal funds must submit to the board an affidavit from a company officer that the build-out will be completed within the twenty-four-month period. Upon completion of the project, an incumbent broadband provider will provide documentation to the board that demonstrates that the unserved addresses meet the minimum download and upload speeds established in the FCC’s definition of high-speed internet access or broadband. If the incumbent broadband provider fails to meet the commitment made in the affidavit filed, the board may award a grant to another provider to provide service for the addresses that remain unserved.(d)
Denying funding for overbuilding of existing broadband networks in order to maximize the total available support for financing rural broadband development;(e)
Ensuring that a proposed project includes:(I)
Access to measurable speeds of at least ten megabits per second downstream and one megabit per second upstream or measurable speeds at least equal to the FCC’s definition of high-speed internet access or broadband, whichever is faster;(II)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(A)
Except as provided in subsection (9)(e)(II)(B) of this section, independent funding secured for at least twenty-five percent of the total cost of the proposed project.(B)
The board may authorize a proposed project awarded grant money pursuant to subsection (9)(a)(V) of this section to secure a lesser amount of independent funding if the proposed project meets the criteria set forth in this subsection (9) and the amount of independent funding secured is the highest amount of independent funding proposed among multiple proposals to serve the area to be served by the proposed project. This subsection (9)(e)(II)(B) is repealed, effective September 1, 2024.(III)
A requirement to utilize any award granted from the HCSM account dedicated to broadband deployment pursuant to subsection (3) of this section for infrastructure purposes only and not for operations;(f)
Providing additional consideration for proposed projects that includes at least some of the following factors:(I)
Proposed projects that provide service to residential and business addresses that lack broadband internet service at measurable speeds of at least ten megabits per second downstream and one megabit per second upstream;(II)
Proposed projects that are endorsed by local entities interested in obtaining broadband internet service in unserved areas of the state;(III)
Proposed projects that have speeds of at least ten megabits per second downstream and one megabit per second upstream or measurable speeds at least equal to the FCC’s definition of high-speed internet access or broadband, whichever is faster;(IV)
Proposed projects for which the applicant has an established record of operation in the area of the grant application;(V)
Proposed projects providing last-mile broadband service, which is defined as the portion of broadband service that delivers an internet connection to an end user; and(VI)
Proposed projects that provide discounted broadband service to low-income households;(g)
Providing an assessment of the following factors:(I)
Whether the proposed project will provide services via a licensed or unlicensed means of transmission;(II)
The cost-effectiveness of the proposed project’s proposed method for expanding broadband internet service into unserved areas; and(III)
The reliability of the network providing broadband services;(h)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
With regard to an applicant that has submitted a proposed project to the board, affording each incumbent provider in the area that is not providing access to a broadband network in the unserved area a right of first refusal regarding the implementation of a project in the unserved area.(II)
If an incumbent provider proposes a project for the area, the incumbent provider commits to providing access to a broadband network:(A)
Within one year after the applicant’s submission of a proposed project;(B)
At demonstrated downstream and upstream speeds equal to or faster than the speeds indicated in the applicant’s proposed project; and(C)
At a cost per household in the area to be served that is equal to or less than the cost per household indicated in the applicant’s proposed project.(i)
Ensuring that broadband service grant awards are not provided in areas other than unserved areas;(j)
In the case of a franchise agreement, ensuring that broadband service grant awards are not provided in areas with a population density large enough to require service under an existing franchise agreement;(k)
Establishing a grant award process that:(I)
Allows an applicant to apply for grants on multiple projects in a given year if the applicant makes a separate application for each project. The board may approve more than one of the applicant’s projects within a single year.(II)
Ensures the geographically equitable distribution of grant awards;(III)
Provides for an appeals process for any party aggrieved by an award or denial of grant money, whether exercising a right of first refusal, having filed any comments regarding the initial grant application, or both. If a provider of broadband service or a broadband network that alleges funding provided pursuant to this section will overbuild the provider’s broadband network, the provider is an aggrieved party with standing to appeal under this subsection (9)(k)(III).(IV)
Requires the board to consider appeals alleging that the application area is no longer unserved because federal support improves a broadband network for service locations that are adjacent to the area receiving the federal award and are within the application area;(l)
Establishing reporting and accountability requirements for a project receiving financial support from the HCSM account dedicated to broadband deployment pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, including contractual requirements that:(I)
The applicant secure a performance bond for the project, as appropriate;(II)
The applicant demonstrate an ability to provide broadband service at a reasonable cost per household in the area to be served by the proposed project;(III)
The applicant demonstrate an ability to complete the proposed project within a reasonable time, not to exceed two years, unless delayed:(A)
By a government entity; or(B)
Due to a demonstrated relevant disruption in the supply chain;(IV)
Prohibit an applicant from using grant award money to offer, provide, or sell broadband services in an area not meeting the definition of unserved area;(V)
The applicant, on an annual basis until the grant money has been fully expended, report to the board on the following:(A)
The number of homes and businesses that the applicant’s grant-supported broadband network serves;(B)
The number of additional homes and businesses that the applicant expects to serve through the grant-supported broadband network within the following year; and(C)
The speed tiers, advertised rates, and services that the applicant offers to customers through the grant-supported broadband network, including speed tiers, rates, and other services that the applicant offers to low-income households; and(VI)
The applicant, after the grant money has been fully expended, provide third-party performance-testing certification, based on FCC-approved performance-testing protocols, that the project meets the original design of, and provides the measurable speeds, rates, and services set forth in, the application;(m)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
Commencing in the grant funding cycle that begins immediately after July 7, 2021, requiring an applicant, or an appellant filing an appeal pursuant to subsection (9)(k)(III) of this section, to submit, in the form and manner determined by the office or, if the FCC adopts regulations requiring the submission of granular coverage data, in the form and manner required by the FCC, granular coverage data to the office. If the FCC adopts such regulations, the office shall not impose any granular coverage data submission requirements that are more onerous or less stringent than the requirements set forth in the FCC’s regulations. Upon request of the board, the office shall inform the board if an applicant has submitted the granular coverage data in accordance with this subsection (9)(m).(II)
Granular coverage data submitted pursuant to this subsection (9)(m) is not a public record as defined in, and is not subject to public disclosure under, the “Colorado Open Records Act”, part 2 of article 72 of this title 24.(III)
As used in this subsection (9)(m), “granular coverage data” means mapping data presented in the form of a coverage polygon or location coordinates that reflects:(A)
The maximum download and upload speeds available in each area;(B)
The technology used to provide the service; and(C)
A differentiation among residential-only, business-only, and residential-and-business broadband services.(9.5)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
The broadband stimulus grant program is hereby created. An applicant seeking a broadband stimulus grant under this subsection (9.5) must meet all of the grant award criteria set forth in this subsection (9.5).(b)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
The board shall award grants pursuant to this subsection (9.5) with money in the broadband stimulus account created in subsection (4)(b) of this section until the money in the account is fully expended.(II)
An applicant seeking grant money under the broadband stimulus grant program must supplement a previously submitted application with or include with a new application an income-qualified plan.(III)
In awarding grants pursuant to this subsection (9.5), the board is encouraged to give priority to proposed projects that will serve critically unserved areas of the state.(c)
On or before January 1, 2022, the board shall submit a report to the governor and the general assembly’s joint budget committee and joint technology committee regarding the board’s implementation of this subsection (9.5). After the initial report the board shall submit subsequent reports to the same parties within six months after the end of any state fiscal year in which the board awards one or more grants pursuant to this subsection (9.5).(d)
Reports submitted pursuant to subsection (9.5)(c) of this section must include:(I)
For each project awarded grant money under the broadband stimulus grant program:(A)
A description of the project, including a description of the use of the grant money in providing broadband;(B)
A summary of the progress made on the project;(C)
The estimated completion date for the project or, if already completed, the date of completion;(D)
A map of the areas to be served or already served by the project;(E)
The percentage of customers who activated broadband through the broadband network provided by the project after a broadband connection was created under the project to their homes or entities and the measurable speeds made available to them;(F)
The type of technology deployed or used for broadband provided through the project; and(G)
The number of households, community anchor institutions, municipalities, and counties served by the project.(II)
The number of applicants to the broadband stimulus grant program, the amounts of grant money requested by each applicant, the number of grants awarded under the broadband stimulus grant program, and the amounts of grant money awarded to each applicant under the broadband stimulus grant program; and(III)
The amount of money expended from the broadband stimulus account versus the amount of money obligated but not yet expended from the broadband stimulus account.(e)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
With respect to grants awarded pursuant to this subsection (9.5) and from money transferred to the broadband stimulus account from the economic recovery and relief cash fund created in section 24-75-228 (2)(a), grants may be awarded only in accordance with treasury department regulations implementing the federal “American Rescue Plan Act of 2021”, Pub.L. 117-2, referred to in this subsection (9.5) as the “treasury department regulations”.(II)
Repealed.(f)
If the treasury department modifies its interim regulations implementing the federal “American Rescue Plan Act of 2021”, Pub.L. 117-2, grants awarded pursuant to subsection (9.5)(e) of this section may only be awarded for broadband projects that comply with the modified federal regulations.(g)
For applications seeking broadband stimulus grants pursuant to this subsection (9.5), the board shall:(I)
Not apply the grant requirements set forth in subsections (9), (11), and (15) of this section;(II)
Review the applications only for compliance with the treasury department regulations; and(III)
Implement processes for appeals and for exercising rights of first refusal that are substantially similar to the processes set forth in subsections (9) and (15.5) of this section, including the provisions in subsection (9) of this section that afford rights to incumbent providers.(h)
For all grants awarded pursuant to this subsection (9.5), the board shall require grantees to comply with all contracting, reporting, and accountability requirements set forth in the treasury department regulations and may require grantees to comply with some or all of the reporting and accountability requirements set forth in subsection (9)(l) of this section.(10)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
The board shall periodically review the website of the federal trade commission and the FCC to determine whether either of those federal agencies has issued a final order or entered into a settlement or consent decree regarding any:(I)
Applicant seeking broadband deployment grant money from the board; or(II)
Internet service provider, as defined in section 40-15-209 (4)(b), to which the board has awarded broadband deployment grant money.(b)
The board shall review any order or decree described in subsection (10)(a) of this section to determine whether the internet service provider that is the subject of the order or decree has engaged in conduct prohibited by section 40-15-209 (1)(a) to (1)(d). The board shall deny the application of any applicant subject to such a federal order or decree and shall inform the commission pursuant to section 40-15-209 (2)(a) about any internet service provider awarded broadband deployment grant money that is subject to such an order or decree.(11)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
The board shall deny an application that contains an area that does not meet the definition of unserved area and shall grant an appeal to an incumbent broadband provider that demonstrates, by a preponderance of the evidence, that an area covered by an application does not meet the definition of unserved area.(b)
If all other application requirements remain met, an application may be amended at any time to remove from the application coverage of an area that does not meet the criteria established pursuant to this section. Alternatively, the board may award a partial grant for an area that does meet the criteria.(12)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
The board shall report annually to the transportation and local government committee and the business affairs and labor committee in the house of representatives and to the transportation and energy committee and business, labor, and technology committee in the senate, or their successor committees, on the projects supported by money from the HCSM account dedicated to broadband deployment pursuant to subsection (3) of this section in a given year, including information on:(I)
The number of projects;(II)
The location of each project;(III)
The amount of funding received for each project; and(IV)
A description of each project.(b)
Notwithstanding section 24-1-136 (11), the report required under this subsection (12) continues indefinitely.(13)
Local entities are encouraged to cooperate with respect to timelines and permit fees concerning projects in their geographic area.(14)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
The board may apply for or otherwise receive federal funding of broadband deployment projects and programs. If the board receives any federal funding, the board shall utilize the request for proposal process established under, or substantially similar to the process established under, subsection (9)(a)(V) of this section to distribute the federal funds as soon as practicable, so long as such process complies with federal requirements for use of the funds and the funds are used for critically unserved areas.(b)
The HCSM third-party contractor shall maintain any federal money awarded for broadband deployment in a separate account of the HCSM that is dedicated to allocating federal broadband deployment money. The commission is authorized to disburse any money from the account as directed by the board.(15)
The board shall make every effort to ensure that a project funded pursuant to this section does not overbuild any project supported or approved by the department of local affairs.(15.5)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(a)
An appeal of a board decision shall be heard in the district court of the city and county of Denver and must be filed within thirty days after the board’s publication of the decision.(b)
If an appellant prevails on appeal, the court may order the board to award the appellant the grant money that the appellant requested in its application to the board, along with the appellant’s court costs. If there is insufficient grant money available in the grant cycle in which the court awards the appellant grant money, the court shall order the board to roll forward the appellant’s application into the next grant cycle and to give priority of funding to the appellant’s application to the extent that the application remains eligible for funding. This subsection (15.5) sets forth the exclusive remedies available to an appellant that prevails in appealing a board decision.(16)
As used in this section:(a)
“Broadband” or “broadband service” has the meaning set forth in section 40-15-102 (3.3).(b)
“Broadband internet service” has the meaning set forth in section 40-15-102 (3.5).(c)
“Broadband network” has the meaning set forth in section 40-15-102 (3.7).(d)
“Commission” means the public utilities commission created in section 40-2-101.(d.5)
“Community anchor institution” has the meaning set forth in section 24-37.5-902 (2).(e)
“Competitive local exchange carrier” means a local exchange provider that is not the incumbent local exchange carrier in an identified exchange area.(f)
“Critically unserved”, when used to describe a household or area, means a household or area that lacks access to at least one nonsatellite provider of broadband service delivered at measurable speeds of either at least ten megabits per second downstream and one megabit per second upstream or at measurable speeds at least equal to one-half of the minimum measurable speeds that qualify as broadband under the FCC definition and rounded up to the nearest whole number, whichever is faster.(g)
“Eligible applicant” means an applicant seeking grant funding for a proposed broadband project under this section with a sufficient business track record to indicate that the applicant’s operations will be sustainable after receiving infrastructure support under this section. The term is limited to for-profit entities; except that a nonprofit telephone cooperative, including its affiliates and subsidiaries, or a nonprofit rural electric association that existed on May 10, 2014, qualifies as an “eligible applicant”. The term is not limited to a current recipient of high cost support mechanism funds.(h)
“FCC” means the federal communications commission.(i)
“High cost support mechanism” or “HCSM” means the support mechanism created pursuant to section 40-15-208.(i.5)
“Income-qualified plan” means a plan that an applicant seeking a broadband stimulus grant pursuant to subsection (9.5) of this section includes in the application to demonstrate that, as part of the applicant’s proposed project, the applicant would provide broadband to income-qualified customers in the proposed service area at a reduced cost.(j)
“Incumbent broadband provider” means a provider that offers broadband internet service over a broadband network in an area covered by an application filed pursuant to this section.(k)
“Incumbent provider” has the meaning set forth in section 40-15-102 (9.5).(l)
“Infrastructure” means the facilities or equipment used in the deployment of broadband service.(m)
Intentionally left blank —Ed.(I)
“Local entity” means elected members of a county or municipal government or the elected members of a metropolitan district that lies wholly within the unincorporated part of a county.(II)
As used in this subsection (16)(m):(A)
“Metropolitan district” has the meaning set forth in section 32-1-103 (10).(B)
“Municipal government” means a home rule or statutory city, town, or city and county or a territorial charter city.(n)
“Overbuild” or “overbuilding” means providing a broadband network to a household or households that:(I)
At the time of application, either have access to a broadband network or have received federal sources of high cost support or federal broadband grants to provide access to a broadband network; and(II)
Account for twenty percent or more of the total household or households to be served by a proposed wireless project.(o)
“Unserved area” has the meaning set forth in section 40-15-102 (32).(17)
This section is repealed, effective September 1, 2024. Before the repeal, the functions of the board regarding the deployment of broadband services into unserved areas are scheduled for review in accordance with section 24-34-104.
Source:
Section 24-37.5-119 — Broadband service - report - broadband deployment board - broadband administrative fund - creation - rules - legislative declaration - definitions - repeal, https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2023-title-24.pdf (accessed Oct. 20, 2023).
Up to date